
I’m still torn on the issue of selling Long Beach West: I hate the idea of giving up such an incredible piece of pristine beachfront property, and I know I’m not alone. Unfortunately, no one has offered a viable, credible option in the form of what would be done with the land under the continued ownership of the town. As a result, we have been left to debate the merits of only one proposed solution: the sale of Long Beach West to the Fish & Wildlife Service.
The proponents of this sale have gone so far to draft an agreement proposal, provide for an easement for public use, implement a federal funding schedule, estimate the cost of cottage removal, and execute a plan for the proceeds that includes protecting the principal while providing a revenue stream in the form of interest accrued. They have brought in a third party to facilitate the sale while having the principals speak at town forums to clarify the particulars of the agreement.
Say what you will about the merits of this proposal, but at least they brought something to the table. In a town known for moving slowly on important issues, they got the ball rolling.
Rather than receiving credit for starting this important process and making it available for debate, these people have been vilified in online forums and chastised for abandoning a sacred trust to keep this land for future generations. I agree that it’s a shame we can’t seem to make it work under our own stewardship up until now. However, when I look to the leadership of the other side, they’re too busy attacking the original proposal to offer anything of substance to counterbalance the other side.
I challenge the opponents of this sale to stand up and perform a valuable service to Stratford: come up with the alternative plan. Talk about a referendum—how much more effective would this be if we could choose between options that had been thoroughly debated and clearly defined? Rise above the politics of retribution and pettiness and focus on solving problems rather than delaying the process of dealing with them. It’s easy to tear holes in something, but creation is an act that takes effort and commitment.
Those in favor of selling the beach have had to explain why there are no guarantees on the federal funding, no written promise of the boardwalk access, the specifics of our access in light of the piping plovers, why we’d have to wait five years for the funding to come through, why we’d be liable for property as those funds are procured, etc. I commend those who initially brought these issues up, as they are important and worthy of spirited debate. Now we need the opponents of the sale to come up with something that can withstand similar scrutiny.
For this alternate plan (or plans) to be valid, we need to be practical: we have to move forward without regard to the former owners of the cottages. As cold as that sounds, we have to move past this ugly chapter in our history if we are to make the best decision regarding this land. We also have to put aside ecological biases because the town government is not primarily in the business of creating refuge wildlife sites. Although we have a responsibility to protect our environment, buying or selling that land does not endanger this habitat—that would depend on future plans for the site. Instead, we must focus on a plan for real-world use of the property if Stratford should keep Long Beach West.
That plan would have to include, among other things, the cost of emergency access after the five years we’re already on the hook for. Where is the funding for the upkeep of this land? Where is would the funding be procured for the destruction of the cottages? What else will generate income at the site comparable to the interest on the ten million dollar sale (keeping in mind the costs involved in the creation and upkeep of this venture)? What firms have been lined up for estimates or counsel? Finally, and most critically for those who favor the sale: how can you assume that the town can effectively manage this property when it hasn’t been able to do so in the twelve years since the bridge burned?
It is certainly not a lock that much more could be accomplished given five more years. We’re still trying to clean ourselves up ten years after winning a settlement in the Raymark hazardous materials suit, still trying to fill the Stratford Army Engine Plant that’s been empty for twelve, and still debating the fate of a landmark theatre that’s been dark for twenty-five. The task of the opponents is to answer these questions better than the proponents have managed to answer theirs.
This is leadership, folks, and the town’s future hangs in the balance. We deserve options, and I challenge the opponents of the sale to step up to the table. I want to keep this beach. We need to know how to save Long Beach West from ourselves!



4 comments:
Amen.
If you really stop and think about it The Stratford Observer hit the nail on the head.
Those against the sale have offered nothing in response but to criticize the contract.
And then, knowing that this tactic is less than perfect, they say "send it to referendum" (that sounds good).
Now why would you send something to referendum (i.e. a bad contract that is bad for the town...as the opponents state) if it is bad for the town?
And, oh by the way, if it passes at referendum the OCucil wants to retain th "authority" to actually negotiate the terms or not sign (hmmm, not really interested in "the will of the people" are you Mr. Kubic and Mr. Henrick).
Shouldn't those on the Council opposed to the transaction (a) vote against it, (b) offer a better solution; (c) all of the above?
The UNITED STATES Fish and Wildlife Service is not Acme Development or the Republic of Iraq!
We are all, excuse me Mr. Singh, MOST of us are all U.S. citizens.
What is wrong with them taking care of our beach?
What is wrong with them cleaning our beach up at no cost to the Stratford Taxpayer?
What is wrong with retaining access to our beach?
What is wrong with a boardwalk built at their cost?
What is wrong with 10 million dollars?
This transaction, in essence, puts the property in trust for our use. It improves it. It takes care of it. It generates revenue for the town.
Now, as stated by the Stratford Observer, "what is the alternative"?
I say before you OPPOSE the proposed sale KNOW the terms of the proposed sale.
This information can easily obtained on the home page of the town's website: www.townofstratford.com
I have read all the documents and, while not a lawyer, they seem to spell out the protections a reasonable person would want.
Assuming the town's corporation counsel says the terms are favorable to the town why wouldn't we support this?
Like the Stratford Observer has said: "what is the alternative"?
You really have to give the town credit for all the information on the website. It is easily the best of the surrounding towns, none of which offer extensive video archiving. Those videos will serve as a valuable record of why it takes so much effort to get things moving in this town--I only hope that enough people start using it rather than relying on spotty local media coverage and the venom on the local bulletin boards!
AS FOR LONG BEACH WEST READ FOR YOURSELF AND WEIGH IN...
On the Town's homepage of its website: www.townofstratford.com
OPTION AGREEMENT
Read the entire negotiated and proposed option agreement regarding Long Beach West (aka West Long Beach).
PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT
Read the public access easement that would guarantee public access on Long Beach West (aka West Long Beach).
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND'S PRESENTATION
DEP's LETTER REGARDING LONG BEACH WEST
Post a Comment